top of page
_DSF4735_edited_edited.jpg

Equity Policy

Position Paper Policy

Position Paper and Crisis Paper Policy

Position and Crisis papers are required for all delegates except for those in the Ad Hoc committee. Any delegate who fails to submit a position/crisis paper by the end of the first committee session will be ineligible for awards. Position/Crisis papers will only be seen by the dais and it will help them understand your goals and motivations in committee. Position papers should be in 12-point font, single-spaced, with a header that includes the delegate’s name, position, committee, school, and (if applicable) topic. Delegates in General Assemblies (GAs), Economic and Social Councils (ECOSOCs), and Specialized Committees should write a one-page position paper per topic. Delegates in crisis committees should write a one-page crisis paper discussing their entire committee. All position papers must be submitted online on the Position Papers page on the OMUN website.

 

Position Papers

The structuring of the position papers is intended to elicit responses from the delegates that provide a clear picture of a nation’s stance on a particular topic area. Each position paper should be structured as follows.

  • First Paragraph: This paragraph should reflect your country’s national interests. National interests are what a country would like to see happen in the world (e.g. Cameroon, a  country troubled by terrorism, might want to reduce the incidence of terrorism to stabilize its government). These interests are not subject to compromise and delegates must reflect these interests within their position paper and the broader conference. 

  • Second Paragraph: This paragraph should discuss your country’s policies and their positions. These policy positions are usually open to negotiation and interpretation, offering you flexibility within your analysis, but remember to stay true to your country’s core interests.

  • Third Paragraph: This paragraph should be a presentation of possible resolution components using existing or imagined methods. Possible resolutions must be consistent with your country’s national interests and current national policies (e.g. Cameroon feels that any resolution on the prevention of terrorism must assign to the injured state the right to try the terrorists. In addition, Cameroon would not be averse to the establishment of an international information network on terrorism so presenting this as a resolution solution is plausible. Cameroon, however, will not support any resolution that allows terrorist acts to be protected from extradition under the political offense exception doctrine). 

 

Writing position papers benefits you in many ways. The staff reads over the position papers and summarizes them in order to gauge what the committee will be like and to see which delegates have prepared themselves for the conference. Writing a position paper makes you think deeply about the information and content you have researched. Lastly, writing a position paper helps you to express ideas concisely and clearly, making you better prepared for the conference and resolution writing.

 

Example position paper: Topic A, Topic B

 

Crisis Papers

Delegates in the Crisis Committees will be writing “crisis papers.” The format for this document is the same as that of a position paper. The difference is in content: while the position paper is your country or character’s public position, the crisis paper is focused on your character’s specific interests, goals, and perspective on the topics of debate. The format and techniques of research are very similar to a traditional position paper with some slight variations such as speaking in the first person perspective. Here is the format for a crisis paper: 

 

  • First Paragraph: This paragraph should introduce your character and their specific perspective on the general topic of the committee. This perspective should be based upon two things: the character description presented to you in the background guide, and any additional research you have completed. This paragraph should have a clear literary voice and strong opinions centered around what your character wants. Essentially, the first paragraph is all about introducing yourself and what you stand for. 

  • Second Paragraph: (you may break this up into multiple smaller paragraphs) In the second paragraph now you dive into the subtopics of debate of the committee. Here you really want your research and character’s beliefs to come through – take a hard stance as to which side of the debate you will lean toward (this, of course, can and should change during the actual debate). This paragraph should generally use the following structure: 1. Introduce the subtopic, let your research and unique perspective shine. 2. Take a stance, i.e., “What will you support in debate and how will you support it?” based on research. 3. Propose a solution to the problem, once again, based on research and your character’s perspective. The solution you propose should give a hint toward what you will propose in committee. 

  • Third paragraph: Here’s where you can have some fun. The content of this third paragraph is really up to you, but a major focus should be hinting at your character’s specific, unique and research based goals. Here you can drop hints as to what your crisis arc may be and how you may accomplish it.  

 

Your mantra for a crisis position paper should be: Specific, unique, research-based and interesting to read. If you have any questions about position or crisis papers please contact your chairs. You can find their emails in your background guide and the chair information section of your committee information tab on this website.

 

Example Crisis Paper 

 

All of your position and crisis papers will be run through Artificial Intelligence detection programs in accordance with our technology policy. If we have reason to believe that a delegate has used Artificial Intelligence, they may be ineligible to award at the discretion of their chairs.

Technology Policy

Artificial Intelligence

OMUN strongly encourages delegates to avoid using artificial intelligence (AI) programs as part of their preparation for conference weekend. We believe that unrestricted use of AI hinders the educational experience we seek to provide to our delegates, particularly given these programs’ proclivity for inaccuracies and bias. While there are benefits to using AI, doing so may prevent delegates from developing many of the diplomatic skills that we seek to teach. Specifically, we warn that using AI may inhibit delegates’ ability to learn about new topics, independently generate strong arguments, collaborate with diverse groups, and develop creative solutions, all of which are at the core of the OMUN experience. Moreover, we believe that similarly to plagiarism, unrestricted AI use can give delegates an unfair advantage.

 

Therefore, the use of artificial intelligence (including, but not limited to, ChatGPT, Bard, and ChatSonic) is entirely prohibited during conference weekend. Prior to the conference, AI software cannot be used to write any part of a position paper; however, AI may be used as a research tool if properly cited. 

 

In all cases, delegates are required to cite any content or ideas that they did not generate themselves; delegates who violate this rule will be subject to sanctions. Thus, as with all other sources, delegates must cite AI platforms that they use for research purposes, including finding references, analyzing information, or generating ideas—failing to cite one’s use of AI software will be regarded as plagiarism. Additionally, the inclusion of any AI-generated writing in a position paper will be considered plagiarism, even if the AI program is properly cited.


For recommendations on citing AI, please visit dal.ca.libguides.com/CitationStyleGuide/citing-ai.

​

Device Use in Committee

To respect other delegates and prevent distractions, the use of laptops, tablets, and cellular devices is generally prohibited in committee rooms while the committee is in session, with some exceptions below. In all organs, delegates may not use these devices during a committee session for any purpose not listed here without the express permission of their chair. Any concerns that a delegate is violating OMUN technology policy or using technology in an inappropriate way may be relayed to the Secretariat.

​

Delegates in General Assemblies and Economic & Social Councils will write their working papers on their laptops; therefore, at their chair’s discretion, delegates may use their laptops during unmoderated caucuses to prepare and compile substantive documents (e.g. working papers and draft resolutions). 

Delegates in crisis committees will be using Slack for their committee’s backroom elements, meaning that computers will be used, however there is no research allowed within the committee. 

Awards Policy

​

Individual Awards

OMUN gives out awards in each committee to recognize delegates who demonstrate strong diplomatic ability through their speaking skills, depth of research, use of factual information, effective collaborative leadership, and their general impact on committee topic discussion. To quantify this impact, the dais will reflect on their engagement within the committee (work in working papers and resolutions, motions passed/presented, etc.) and its results. Additionally, in crisis committees, the dais will evaluate the quality and impact of delegates’ crisis arcs. Importantly, in awards selection, chairs will prioritize delegates who are consistently inclusive and respectful towards all other members of their committee, including the dais.

The awards will be presented as follows and reflect a delegate's ability to meet our conference expectations as explained above.

  • Best Delegate

  • Outstanding Delegate

  • Honorable Mention

  • Best Position Paper 

 

*The number of Outstanding Delegates and Honorable Mentions is subject to change based on committee size and at the chairs’ discretion, with the approval of the Secretariat.

Additionally, delegates are required to submit a position paper by the end of the first committee session to be eligible for an award, except in the Ad hoc Committee. Any delegate found guilty of plagiarism, pre-writing (formation of concrete bloc resolutions prior to or outside of committee time), improper Artificial Intelligence use, or other violations of the general policies, as described above, will be immediately disqualified from any award in their committee, and their delegation as a whole may be entirely removed from consideration for delegation and/or individual awards.

​

Delegation Awards

Delegation awards reflect a delegation's ability to demonstrate excellence across a wide range of committees. All delegation awards will be issued with reference to the delegation’s size, based on whether the number of delegates falls above or below the median delegation size. Delegates should avoid trying to estimate this cutoff in advance.

Large Delegation Awards

  • Best Large Delegation

  • Outstanding Large Delegation

Small Delegation Awards

  • Best Small Delegation

  • Outstanding Small Delegation

Ontario Model United Nations

©2025 by OMUN. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page